McMerrick Cup SUNDAY

# SchoolTeam Rec.
1 Brown University Brown University Bears 5–0
2 Dartmouth College Dartmouth College Big Green 4–1
3 Salve Regina University Salve Regina University Seahawks 3–1
4 Massachusetts Maritime Academy Massachusetts Maritime Academy Buccaneers 2–3
5 University of Vermont University of Vermont Catamounts 2 2–3
6 Roger Williams University Roger Williams University Hawks 1–4
7 University of Vermont University of Vermont Catamounts 1 0–5

Pre-event forecast

Fitted on the 22,398 team race matches sailed before 2024-03-03, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 10 of 17 matches (59%) with a log-loss of 0.693 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went poorly for the forecast. Orderliness −0.86 ± 0.41: an upset-heavy event, more orderly than 5% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.

PlaceSchool Pred. Strength Boats (skipper / crew, boat value) Pred. win % Recordvs forecast
1Brown University
Bears
18.67
school +0.27
Connor Macken / Janelle Li 2.38
Ethan Simpson / Talia Levine 2.97
Blake Behrens / Corinne Harrison 3.04
92%5–0 (100%)+0.4
2Dartmouth College
Big Green
27.48
school +0.29
Ava Hurwitz / Phoebe Lee 1.73
Ryan Satterberg / Sophie Menyhart 3.06
Ben Sheppard / Vivian Heitkoetter 2.35
75%4–1 (80%)+0.3
3Salve Regina University
Seahawks
64.92
school −0.41
Emil Tullberg / Kate Johnson 2.58
Olivia Lowthian / Caelan Haddock 1.96
Sean Morrison / Charlotte Martinez 0.88 2–1
Tyler Winowiecki / Charlotte Martinez 1–0
22%3–1 (75%)+2.1
4Massachusetts Maritime Academy
Buccaneers
74.03Zach Earnshaw / Henry Kyburg-Abbott 1.00
Luke Kenahan / Luke Dubois 1.30
Andy Leshaw / Cole Capizzo 1.40 1–2
Tyler Egeli / Mallory Dietsch 2.08 1–1
10%2–3 (40%)+1.5
5University of Vermont
Catamounts 2
54.98
school −0.23
Alvaro Nadal-Alvarez / Campbell Mcclellan 2.08
Cooper Smith / Alex Boni 1.75
Zachary Amelotte / Jack Taylor 1–2
Ryan Begin / Zachary Amelotte 1.18 0–1
Ryan Begin / Jack Taylor 1.16 1–0
36%2–3 (40%)+0.2
6Roger Williams University
Hawks
36.33
school +0.28, home +0.40
Jack Crager / Meg Woolverton 2.02
Jakub Fuja / Alexandra Chigas 1.71
Peter Cotoia / Madelyn Lascala 1.85 1–3
Peter Cotoia / Dominique Spinola 1.91 0–1
58%1–4 (20%)−1.9
7University of Vermont
Catamounts 1
46.04
school −0.23
Calvin Lamosse / Will Broseman 2.26
Christian Cushman / Brooke Willke 2.15 0–3
Elizabeth Amelotte / Maddy Saffer 1.60 0–2
Christian Cushman / Alex Forrest 2.23 0–2
Ryan Potter / Brooke Willke 1.95 0–2
Ryan Potter / Alex Forrest 2.02 0–1
53%0–5 (0%)−2.6

Surprisal: who beat their rating

Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.

PlaceSchoolStrength Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
3Salve Regina University Seahawks4.928.053–10.9+3.134.72%
1Brown University Bears8.6711.675–04.6≥+3.000.664%
4Massachusetts Maritime Academy Buccaneers4.036.142–30.5+2.112.67%
2Dartmouth College Big Green7.487.964–13.7+0.480.166%
5University of Vermont Catamounts 24.985.232–31.8+0.250.062%
6Roger Williams University Hawks6.333.681–42.9−2.653.6>99%
7University of Vermont Catamounts 16.043.040–52.6≤−3.006.7>99%

By skipper

SkipperSchoolValue Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
Emil TullbergSalve Regina University2.585.713–10.9+3.134.72%
Olivia LowthianSalve Regina University1.965.093–10.9+3.134.72%
Zach EarnshawMassachusetts Maritime Academy1.003.112–30.5+2.112.67%
Andy LeshawMassachusetts Maritime Academy1.403.261–20.3+1.861.127%
Ava HurwitzDartmouth College1.732.224–13.7+0.480.166%
Alvaro Nadal-AlvarezUniversity of Vermont2.082.332–31.8+0.250.062%
Jack CragerRoger Williams University2.02-0.621–42.9−2.653.6>99%

Match by match

Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).

Rd#WinnerLoser P(winner)
11Brown University BearsMassachusetts Maritime Academy Buccaneers99%
12Dartmouth College Big GreenRoger Williams University Hawks76%
13Salve Regina University SeahawksUniversity of Vermont Catamounts 248%upset
14Brown University BearsUniversity of Vermont Catamounts 195%
15Roger Williams University HawksMassachusetts Maritime Academy Buccaneers93%
16Dartmouth College Big GreenUniversity of Vermont Catamounts 294%
17Salve Regina University SeahawksUniversity of Vermont Catamounts 124%upset
18Brown University BearsRoger Williams University Hawks91%
19Massachusetts Maritime Academy BuccaneersUniversity of Vermont Catamounts 221%upset
110Dartmouth College Big GreenUniversity of Vermont Catamounts 184%
111Brown University BearsSalve Regina University Seahawks97%
112University of Vermont Catamounts 2Roger Williams University Hawks23%upset
113Massachusetts Maritime Academy BuccaneersUniversity of Vermont Catamounts 115%upset
114Brown University BearsDartmouth College Big Green76%
115Salve Regina University SeahawksRoger Williams University Hawks14%upset
116University of Vermont Catamounts 2University of Vermont Catamounts 119%upset
117Dartmouth College Big GreenMassachusetts Maritime Academy Buccaneers95%

Round 1

TeamRec.BearsGreenSeahawksBuccaneers2Hawks1
Brown University Bears5–0✕WWWWWW
Dartmouth College Big Green4–1L✕–WWWW
Salve Regina University Seahawks3–1L–✕–WWW
Massachusetts Maritime Academy Buccaneers2–3LL–✕WLW
University of Vermont Catamounts 22–8LLLL✕W✕
Roger Williams University Hawks1–4LLLWL✕L
University of Vermont Catamounts 12–8LLLL✕W✕
# Winner Loser Pos.
1 Brown University Bears 1-2-3 def. Massachusetts Maritime Academy Buccaneers 4-5-6
2 Dartmouth College Big Green 1-2-5 def. Roger Williams University Hawks 3-4-6
3 Salve Regina University Seahawks 1-2-6 def. University of Vermont Catamounts 2 3-4-5
4 Brown University Bears 1-2-3 def. University of Vermont Catamounts 1 4-5-6
5 Roger Williams University Hawks 2-3-4 def. Massachusetts Maritime Academy Buccaneers 1-5-6
6 Dartmouth College Big Green 1-2-3 def. University of Vermont Catamounts 2 4-5-6
7 Salve Regina University Seahawks 1-2-6 def. University of Vermont Catamounts 1 3-4-5
8 Brown University Bears 1-2-5 def. Roger Williams University Hawks 3-4-6
9 Massachusetts Maritime Academy Buccaneers 1-2-6 def. University of Vermont Catamounts 2 3-4-5
10 Dartmouth College Big Green 1-2-5 def. University of Vermont Catamounts 1 3-4-6
11 Brown University Bears 1-2-3 def. Salve Regina University Seahawks 4-5-6
12 University of Vermont Catamounts 2 1-2-3 def. Roger Williams University Hawks 4-5-6
13 Massachusetts Maritime Academy Buccaneers 1-2-6 def. University of Vermont Catamounts 1 3-4-5
14 Brown University Bears 2-3-4 def. Dartmouth College Big Green 1-5-6
15 Salve Regina University Seahawks 1-2-6 def. Roger Williams University Hawks 3-4-5
16 University of Vermont Catamounts 2 1-3-6 def. University of Vermont Catamounts 1 2-4-5
17 Dartmouth College Big Green 1-2-3 def. Massachusetts Maritime Academy Buccaneers 4-5-6

Conditions — 03/03/2024 (8am–6pm)

☁️Overcast
Humidity 90%  ·  Pressure 1019.9 hPa

Temperature

45°F
↑ 50°F   ↓ 42°F
Feels like 39°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
8.2 kn
avg  ·  max 10.3 kn
Gusts to 12.4 kn
From NNW (342°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover95% Sunshine2.0 hrs Humidity90% Pressure1019.9 hPa

What this breeze does at Roger Williams — from fleet racing

Breeze: N about 10 kn (weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In fleet races at Roger Williams in this breeze: an underdogs’ day (−0.09)
Underdogs’ conditions: in fleet racing here the fleet bunches up and lower-rated boats beat the seeds more often than usual.

Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.09 means a rating gap counts about 8% less than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at Roger Williams by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (20 labelled fleet-race days at Roger Williams).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →