| # | School | Team | Rec. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Roger Williams University | Hawks | 13–4 | |
| 2 | Brown University | Bears | 12–5 | |
| 3 | Boston College | Eagles | 11–6 | |
| 4 | Tufts University | Jumbos | 10–7 | |
| 5 | Harvard University | Crimson | 9–7 | |
| 6 | University of Vermont | Catamounts | 5–11 | |
| 7 | Dartmouth College | Big Green | 4–8 | |
| 7 | Yale University | Bulldogs | 4–8 | |
| 9 | University of Michigan | Wolverines | 3–9 | |
| 9 | U. S. Naval Academy | Midshipmen | 3–9 |
Each side is the sum of its three boats (the skipper's fleet rating times 0.72 plus a team race offset learned from their past matches, plus the crew's offset and a small experience term) plus the school's team race strength and a home-water edge for the host. The win probability is a logistic function of the difference. The forecast was made before the event: the model was refitted on every match sailed before the first day, with fleet ratings as of the week before.
Fitted on the 2,744 team race matches sailed before 2014-03-22, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 52 of 74 matches (70%) with a log-loss of 0.559 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went about as expected for the forecast. Orderliness +0.27 ± 0.29: a typical event, more orderly than 73% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.
For each side, the performance strength is the value that would have made its record least surprising: the strength at which the model's expected wins over exactly these opponents equal the actual wins, with every opponent fixed at its pre-event strength. For a skipper, the same shift is applied only to their boat in the matches they sailed, with team-mates and opponents fixed; team-mates who sailed every match together therefore get the same number. Surprise is in bits: -log2 of the probability of the record at the pre-event strength minus the same at the performance strength. P(this good or better) treats matches as independent coin flips at the model's pre-event probabilities, so it ignores form within the day; read it as a rough guide.
Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.
| Place | School | Strength | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Roger Williams University | 10.70 | 11.76 | 13–4 | 9.5 | +1.06 | 2.6 | 5% |
| 5 | Harvard University | 10.10 | 10.59 | 9–7 | 7.3 | +0.49 | 0.6 | 26% |
| 2 | Brown University | 10.92 | 11.36 | 12–5 | 10.5 | +0.44 | 0.4 | 31% |
| 4 | Tufts University | 10.70 | 10.88 | 10–7 | 9.4 | +0.18 | 0.1 | 47% |
| 9 | University of Michigan | 8.82 | 8.73 | 3–9 | 3.2 | −0.09 | 0.0 | 67% |
| 7 | Dartmouth College | 9.33 | 9.14 | 4–8 | 4.4 | −0.19 | 0.1 | 72% |
| 7 | Yale University | 9.51 | 9.10 | 4–8 | 5.0 | −0.41 | 0.3 | 83% |
| 9 | U. S. Naval Academy | 9.29 | 8.68 | 3–9 | 4.4 | −0.61 | 0.6 | 89% |
| 3 | Boston College | 11.57 | 10.94 | 11–6 | 13.1 | −0.63 | 1.0 | 93% |
| 6 | University of Vermont | 10.07 | 9.41 | 5–11 | 7.2 | −0.66 | 1.0 | 93% |
Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).
| Team | Rec. | Hawks | Bears | Eagles | Jumbos | Crimson | Catamounts | Green | Bulldogs | Wolverines | Midshipmen | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Williams University Hawks | 9–0 | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Brown University Bears | 7–2 | L | ✕ | W | W | L | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Boston College Eagles | 7–2 | L | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 6–3 | L | L | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Harvard University Crimson | 5–4 | L | W | L | L | ✕ | W | L | W | W | W | |
| University of Vermont Catamounts | 3–6 | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ | L | W | W | W | |
| Dartmouth College Big Green | 2–7 | L | L | L | L | W | W | ✕ | L | L | L | |
| Yale University Bulldogs | 2–7 | L | L | L | L | L | L | W | ✕ | L | W | |
| University of Michigan Wolverines | 2–7 | L | L | L | L | L | L | W | W | ✕ | L | |
| U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen | 2–7 | L | L | L | L | L | L | W | L | W | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Green | Bulldogs | Wolverines | Midshipmen | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dartmouth College Big Green | 2–1 | ✕ | W | W | L | |
| Yale University Bulldogs | 2–1 | L | ✕ | W | W | |
| University of Michigan Wolverines | 1–2 | L | L | ✕ | W | |
| U. S. Naval Academy Midshipmen | 1–2 | W | L | L | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Hawks | Bears | Eagles | Jumbos | Crimson | Catamounts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Williams University Hawks | 3–2 | ✕ | W | W | L | L | W | |
| Brown University Bears | 2–3 | L | ✕ | L | W | W | L | |
| Boston College Eagles | 3–2 | L | W | ✕ | L | W | W | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 3–2 | W | L | W | ✕ | L | W | |
| Harvard University Crimson | 3–2 | W | L | L | W | ✕ | W | |
| University of Vermont Catamounts | 1–4 | L | W | L | L | L | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Hawks | Bears | Eagles | Jumbos | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Williams University Hawks | 1–2 | ✕ | L | L | W | |
| Brown University Bears | 3–0 | W | ✕ | W | W | |
| Boston College Eagles | 1–2 | W | L | ✕ | L | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 1–2 | L | L | W | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Crimson | Catamounts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvard University Crimson | 0–1 | ✕ | L | |
| University of Vermont Catamounts | 1–0 | W | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Crimson | Catamounts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvard University Crimson | 1–0 | ✕ | W | |
| University of Vermont Catamounts | 0–1 | L | ✕ |
| # | Winner | Loser | Pos. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Big Green | 1-2-3 | def. | Crimson | 4-5-6 | ||
| 2 | Hawks | 1-2-5 | def. | Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 3 | Eagles | 1-2-6 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-5 | ||
| 4 | Catamounts | 1-3-4 | def. | Midshipmen | 2-5-6 | ||
| 5 | Wolverines | 1-2-6 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-4-5 | ||
| 6 | Bears | 2-3-4 | def. | Big Green | 1-5-6 | ||
| 7 | Eagles | 2-3-6 | def. | Crimson | 1-4-5 DSQ | ||
| 8 | Hawks | 2-3-4 | def. | Midshipmen | 1-5-6 | ||
| 9 | Jumbos | 1-3-5 | def. | Bulldogs | 2-4-6 | ||
| 10 | Catamounts | 1-2-5 | def. | Wolverines | 3-4-6 | ||
| 11 | Bears | 1-2-3 | def. | Eagles | 4-5-6 | ||
| 12 | Midshipmen | 1-3-6 | def. | Big Green | 2-4-5 | ||
| 13 | Crimson | 1-2-6 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-4-5 | ||
| 14 | Hawks | 1-4-5 | def. | Catamounts | 2-3-6 DNF | ||
| 15 | Jumbos | 1-2-4 | def. | Wolverines | 3-5-6 | ||
| 16 | Eagles | 1-2-3 | def. | Midshipmen | 4-5-6 | ||
| 17 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-4-6 | ||
| 18 | Big Green | 1-2-6 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-5 | ||
| 19 | Jumbos | 1-2-3 | def. | Crimson | 4-5-6 | ||
| 20 | Hawks | 1-2-4 | def. | Wolverines | 3-5-6 | ||
| 21 | Bulldogs | 1-2-6 | def. | Midshipmen | 3-4-5 | ||
| 22 | Eagles | 1-2-6 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-5 | ||
| 23 | Bears | 2-3-4 | def. | Jumbos | 1-5-6 | ||
| 24 | Hawks | 1-2-3 | def. | Big Green | 4-5-6 | ||
| 25 | Crimson | 1-2-6 | def. | Wolverines | 3-4-5 | ||
| 26 | Catamounts | 1-2-5 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-4-6 | ||
| 27 | Jumbos | 1-3-5 | def. | Midshipmen | 2-4-6 | ||
| 28 | Hawks | 1-2-5 | def. | Eagles | 3-4-6 | ||
| 29 | Crimson | 1-2-4 | def. | Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 30 | Wolverines | 1-4-5 | def. | Big Green | 2-3-6 | ||
| 31 | Jumbos | 2-3-4 | def. | Catamounts | 1-5-6 | ||
| 32 | Hawks | 1-2-5 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-4-6 | ||
| 33 | Crimson | 1-2-6 | def. | Midshipmen | 3-4-5 | ||
| 34 | Eagles | 1-2-3 | def. | Big Green | 4-5-6 | ||
| 35 | Bears | 1-2-3 | def. | Wolverines | 4-5-6 | ||
| 36 | Hawks | 1-4-5 DSQ | def. | Jumbos | 2-3-6 DSQ | ||
| 37 | Crimson | 3-4-5 | def. | Catamounts | 1-2-6 DSQ | ||
| 38 | Bulldogs | 1-2-5 | def. | Big Green | 3-4-6 | ||
| 39 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Midshipmen | 3-4-6 | ||
| 40 | Eagles | 1-2-3 | def. | Wolverines | 4-5-6 DNF,DNF,DNF | ||
| 41 | Hawks | 1-2-3 | def. | Crimson | 4-5-6 | ||
| 42 | Jumbos | 1-2-4 | def. | Big Green | 3-5-6 | ||
| 43 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-6 | ||
| 44 | Eagles | 1-2-4 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-5-6 | ||
| 45 | Midshipmen | 1-2-4 | def. | Wolverines | 3-5-6 | ||
| 46 | Wolverines | 2-3-4 | def. | Midshipmen | 1-5-6 | ||
| 47 | Big Green | 1-3-6 | def. | Bulldogs | 2-4-5 | ||
| 48 | Bulldogs | 1-2-4 | def. | Wolverines | 3-5-6 | ||
| 49 | Midshipmen | 2-3-4 | def. | Big Green | 1-5-6 | ||
| 50 | Bulldogs | 2-3-4 | def. | Midshipmen | 1-5-6 | ||
| 51 | Big Green | 1-3-4 | def. | Wolverines | 2-5-6 | ||
| 52 | Bears | 2-3-4 | def. | Jumbos | 1-5-6 | ||
| 53 | Eagles | 1-2-5 | def. | Crimson | 3-4-6 | ||
| 54 | Hawks | 1-2-3 | def. | Catamounts | 4-5-6 | ||
| 55 | Eagles | 1-2-4 | def. | Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 56 | Jumbos | 1-2-3 | def. | Catamounts | 4-5-6 | ||
| 57 | Crimson | 1-2-5 | def. | Hawks | 3-4-6 | ||
| 58 | Eagles | 1-2-5 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-6 | ||
| 59 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Crimson | 3-4-6 | ||
| 60 | Jumbos | 1-2-6 | def. | Hawks | 3-4-5 | ||
| 61 | Crimson | 1-2-3 | def. | Catamounts | 4-5-6 DNF | ||
| 62 | Jumbos | 2-3-4 | def. | Eagles | 1-5-6 | ||
| 63 | Hawks | 1-2-6 | def. | Bears | 3-4-5 | ||
| 64 | Crimson | 1-5-6 | def. | Jumbos | 2-3-4 DSQ | ||
| 65 | Catamounts | 1-2-6 | def. | Bears | 3-4-5 | ||
| 66 | Hawks | 1-2-4 | def. | Eagles | 3-5-6 | ||
| 67 | Bears | 1-2-4 | def. | Hawks | 3-5-6 | ||
| 68 | Jumbos | 1-5-6 | def. | Eagles | 2-3-4 DSQ | ||
| 69 | Hawks | 1-2-5 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-6 | ||
| 70 | Bears | 3-4-6 | def. | Eagles | 1-2-5 DSQ | ||
| 71 | Bears | 1-3-6 | def. | Jumbos | 2-4-5 | ||
| 72 | Eagles | 1-2-5 DSQ | def. | Hawks | 3-4-6 DSQ | ||
| 73 | Catamounts | 2-3-4 | def. | Crimson | 1-5-6 | ||
| 74 | Crimson | 1-2-4 | def. | Catamounts | 3-5-6 | ||
Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.08 means a rating gap counts about 7% less than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.