| # | School | Team | Rec. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Connecticut College | Camels | 13–1 | |
| 2 | Bowdoin College | Polar Bears | 10–4 | |
| 2 | Boston University | Terriers | 10–4 | |
| 2 | University of Rhode Island | Rams | 10–4 | |
| 5 | Brown University | Bears | 6–8 | |
| 6 | U. S. Coast Guard Academy | Bears | 4–10 | |
| 7 | Salve Regina University | Seahawks | 3–11 | |
| 8 | University of New Hampshire | Wildcats | 0–14 |
Each side is the sum of its three boats (the skipper's fleet rating times 0.72 plus a team race offset learned from their past matches, plus the crew's offset and a small experience term) plus the school's team race strength and a home-water edge for the host. The win probability is a logistic function of the difference. The forecast was made before the event: the model was refitted on every match sailed before the first day, with fleet ratings as of the week before.
Fitted on the 133 team race matches sailed before 2013-03-02, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 42 of 56 matches (75%) with a log-loss of 0.423 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went well for the forecast. vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.
For each side, the performance strength is the value that would have made its record least surprising: the strength at which the model's expected wins over exactly these opponents equal the actual wins, with every opponent fixed at its pre-event strength. For a skipper, the same shift is applied only to their boat in the matches they sailed, with team-mates and opponents fixed; team-mates who sailed every match together therefore get the same number. Surprise is in bits: -log2 of the probability of the record at the pre-event strength minus the same at the performance strength. P(this good or better) treats matches as independent coin flips at the model's pre-event probabilities, so it ignores form within the day; read it as a rough guide.
Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.
| Place | School | Strength | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Salve Regina University | 8.52 | 9.99 | 3–11 | 2.0 | +1.47 | 1.2 | 19% |
| 2 | Bowdoin College | 11.35 | 12.52 | 10–4 | 7.5 | +1.17 | 2.1 | 9% |
| 2 | University of Rhode Island | 12.10 | 13.22 | 10–4 | 7.6 | +1.11 | 1.9 | 10% |
| 2 | Boston University | 12.28 | 12.85 | 10–4 | 8.8 | +0.57 | 0.5 | 32% |
| 1 | Connecticut College | 13.66 | 13.68 | 13–1 | 13.0 | +0.02 | 0.0 | 73% |
| 5 | Brown University | 11.71 | 10.89 | 6–8 | 7.6 | −0.82 | 0.9 | 93% |
| 8 | University of New Hampshire | 4.65 | 1.65 | 0–14 | 0.3 | ≤−3.00 | 0.4 | >99% |
| 6 | U. S. Coast Guard Academy | 12.14 | 9.11 | 4–10 | 9.1 | −3.03 | 9.7 | >99% |
Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).
| Team | Rec. | Camels | Bears | Terriers | Rams | Bears | Bears | Seahawks | Wildcats | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Connecticut College Camels | 7–0 | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Bowdoin College Polar Bears | 4–3 | L | ✕ | L | L | W | W | W | W | |
| Boston University Terriers | 6–1 | L | W | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | |
| University of Rhode Island Rams | 5–2 | L | W | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | |
| Brown University Bears | 3–4 | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | W | W | |
| U. S. Coast Guard Academy Bears | 1–6 | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ | L | W | |
| Salve Regina University Seahawks | 2–5 | L | L | L | L | L | W | ✕ | W | |
| University of New Hampshire Wildcats | 0–7 | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Camels | Bears | Terriers | Rams | Bears | Bears | Seahawks | Wildcats | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Connecticut College Camels | 6–1 | ✕ | W | W | W | L | W | W | W | |
| Bowdoin College Polar Bears | 6–1 | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Boston University Terriers | 4–3 | L | L | ✕ | L | W | W | W | W | |
| University of Rhode Island Rams | 5–2 | L | L | W | ✕ | W | W | W | W | |
| Brown University Bears | 3–4 | W | L | L | L | ✕ | L | W | W | |
| U. S. Coast Guard Academy Bears | 3–4 | L | L | L | L | W | ✕ | W | W | |
| Salve Regina University Seahawks | 1–6 | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | |
| University of New Hampshire Wildcats | 0–7 | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ |
| # | Winner | Loser | Pos. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Camels | 1-2-3 | def. | Wildcats | 4-5-6 | ||
| 2 | Polar Bears | 1-3-4 | def. | Wildcats | 2-5-6 | ||
| 3 | Bears | 1-3-5 | def. | Wildcats | 2-4-6 | ||
| 4 | Bears | 1-2-3 | def. | Wildcats | 4-5-6 | ||
| 5 | Terriers | 1-2-3 | def. | Wildcats | 4-5-6 | ||
| 6 | Seahawks | 1-2-5 | def. | Wildcats | 3-4-6 | ||
| 7 | Rams | 1-2-3 | def. | Wildcats | 4-5-6 | ||
| 8 | Camels | 1-2-5 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 9 | Camels | 1-3-4 | def. | Bears | 2-5-6 | ||
| 10 | Camels | 1-3-6 | def. | Bears | 2-4-5 | ||
| 11 | Camels | 1-2-5 | def. | Terriers | 3-4-6 | ||
| 12 | Camels | 1-2-3 | def. | Seahawks | 4-5-6 | ||
| 13 | Camels | 1-2-5 | def. | Rams | 3-4-6 | ||
| 14 | Polar Bears | 1-3-6 | def. | Bears | 2-4-5 | ||
| 15 | Polar Bears | 1-3-4 | def. | Bears | 2-5-6 | ||
| 16 | Terriers | 1-2-3 | def. | Polar Bears | 4-5-6 | ||
| 17 | Polar Bears | 2-3-4 | def. | Seahawks | 1-5-6 | ||
| 18 | Rams | 1-2-5 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 19 | Bears | 1-2-6 | def. | Bears | 3-4-5 | ||
| 20 | Terriers | 1-2-5 | def. | Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 21 | Seahawks | 2-3-5 | def. | Bears | 1-4-6 | ||
| 22 | Rams | 1-4-5 | def. | Bears | 2-3-6 | ||
| 23 | Terriers | 1-2-5 | def. | Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 24 | Bears | 1-2-3 | def. | Seahawks | 4-5-6 | ||
| 25 | Rams | 1-2-5 | def. | Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 26 | Terriers | 1-2-5 | def. | Seahawks | 3-4-6 | ||
| 27 | Terriers | 2-3-4 | def. | Rams | 1-5-6 | ||
| 28 | Rams | 1-2-4 | def. | Seahawks | 3-5-6 | ||
| 29 | Camels | 1-2-3 | def. | Wildcats | 4-5-6 | ||
| 30 | Polar Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Wildcats | 3-4-6 | ||
| 31 | Bears | 1-3-5 | def. | Wildcats | 2-4-6 | ||
| 32 | Bears | 1-2-3 | def. | Wildcats | 4-5-6 | ||
| 33 | Terriers | 1-2-3 | def. | Wildcats | 4-5-6 | ||
| 34 | Seahawks | 1-2-5 | def. | Wildcats | 3-4-6 | ||
| 35 | Rams | 1-2-3 | def. | Wildcats | 4-5-6 | ||
| 36 | Camels | 1-2-4 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 37 | Camels | 1-2-4 | def. | Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 38 | Bears | 1-3-6 | def. | Camels | 2-4-5 | ||
| 39 | Camels | 1-2-5 | def. | Terriers | 3-4-6 | ||
| 40 | Camels | 1-2-4 | def. | Seahawks | 3-5-6 | ||
| 41 | Camels | 1-2-6 | def. | Rams | 3-4-5 | ||
| 42 | Polar Bears | 1-3-5 | def. | Bears | 2-4-6 | ||
| 43 | Polar Bears | 2-3-4 | def. | Bears | 1-5-6 | ||
| 44 | Polar Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Terriers | 3-4-6 | ||
| 45 | Polar Bears | 1-2-6 | def. | Seahawks | 3-4-5 | ||
| 46 | Polar Bears | 1-3-6 | def. | Rams | 2-4-5 | ||
| 47 | Bears | 1-2-4 | def. | Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 48 | Terriers | 1-3-6 | def. | Bears | 2-4-5 | ||
| 49 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Seahawks | 3-4-6 | ||
| 50 | Rams | 1-2-4 | def. | Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 51 | Terriers | 2-3-5 | def. | Bears | 1-4-6 | ||
| 52 | Bears | 1-2-3 | def. | Seahawks | 4-5-6 | ||
| 53 | Rams | 1-2-5 | def. | Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 54 | Terriers | 1-2-4 | def. | Seahawks | 3-5-6 | ||
| 55 | Rams | 1-3-5 | def. | Terriers | 2-4-6 | ||
| 56 | Rams | 1-3-4 | def. | Seahawks | 2-5-6 | ||
Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.13 means a rating gap counts about 11% less than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.