MAISA Team Race Challenge

# SchoolTeam Rec.
1 Cornell University Cornell University Big Red 7–0
2 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 6–1
3 SUNY Maritime College SUNY Maritime College Privateers 5–2
4 Washington College Washington College Shoremen 4–3
5 George Washington University George Washington University Colonials 3–4
6 U. S. Merchant Marine Academy U. S. Merchant Marine Academy Mariners 1–6
7 Columbia University Columbia University Lions 1–6
8 University of Buffalo University of Buffalo Bulls 1–6

Pre-event forecast

Fitted on the 3,109 team race matches sailed before 2014-03-29, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 24 of 28 matches (86%) with a log-loss of 0.349 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went well for the forecast. Orderliness +0.05 ± 0.36: a typical event, more orderly than 47% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.

PlaceSchool Pred. Strength Boats (skipper / crew, boat value) Pred. win % Recordvs forecast
1Cornell University
Big Red
38.64
school +0.14
Duncan Howes / Claire Riedman 3.05
Matthew Schofield / Lindsey Ludwig 2.92
Alex Woloshyn / Gregory Reppucci 2.52
72%7–0 (100%)+2.0
2Hobart and William Smith Colleges
Statesmen
19.39
school +0.17, home +0.36
Eddie Cox / Allison Aughtry 3.01
William Godfrey / Jane Rew 2.77
Elliott Morrill / Julia Oak 3.06
84%6–1 (86%)+0.1
3SUNY Maritime College
Privateers
48.41
school −0.39
Julia Paxton / Christopher Whalen 2.79
Matthew Schoene / Paige Conlin 2.52
Nick Valente / George Roberson 3.48
67%5–2 (71%)+0.3
4Washington College
Shoremen
28.61
school +0.45
Ryan Bailey / Alexandra Crawford 3.02
Charles Nunn / Hannah Schmidt 2.81 4–0
Eric Siegel / Matthew Mcdermaid 2.56 1–3
Charles Nunn / Karlyn Long 2.87 0–3
Eleanor Conroy / Matthew Mcdermaid 1.92 3–0
76%4–3 (57%)−1.3
5George Washington University
Colonials
56.56
school −0.40
Daniel Delbello / Meagan Murphy 2.75
Colin Kennedy / Sarah Mccormack 2.14
Jay Spector / Kaitlin Denny 1.52 3–1
Brendan Shanahan / Matthew Ricci 2.77 0–3
41%3–4 (43%)+0.1
6U. S. Merchant Marine Academy
Mariners
65.93
school −0.13
Max Neubelt / Wardlaw Skinner 2.42
Austin Neuman / Heidi Neubelt
Charles Skord / Patrick Scollard 1.81
35%1–6 (14%)−1.5
7Columbia University
Lions
83.10Conor Cashel / Catherine Duggan
Laura Maranto / Nicolas Leeper
Paolo Bertolotti / Anna Knight
4%1–6 (14%)+0.7
8University of Buffalo
Bulls
74.80
school −0.17
Griffin Orr / Melissa Eiffert 2.78
Luke Miller / Hayley Wennberg 1.24
Andrew Green / Jaimie Sprague 0.74
20%1–6 (14%)−0.4

Surprisal: who beat their rating

Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.

PlaceSchoolStrength Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
1Cornell University8.6411.647–05.0≥+3.003.86%
7Columbia University3.104.711–60.3+1.621.025%
3SUNY Maritime College8.418.695–24.7+0.280.159%
2Hobart and William Smith Colleges9.399.566–15.9+0.170.069%
5George Washington University6.566.693–42.9+0.130.063%
8University of Buffalo4.803.951–61.4−0.850.293%
4Washington College8.617.304–35.3−1.311.397%
6U. S. Merchant Marine Academy5.933.681–62.5−2.262.399%

By skipper

SkipperSchoolValue Perf.RecordExp.
wins
ΔSurprise
(bits)
P(this good
or better)
Duncan HowesCornell University3.056.057–05.0≥+3.003.86%
Matthew SchofieldCornell University2.925.927–05.0≥+3.003.86%
Alex WoloshynCornell University2.525.527–05.0≥+3.003.86%
Eleanor ConroyWashington College1.924.923–02.8≥+3.000.378%
Laura MarantoColumbia University0.271.891–60.3+1.621.025%
Paolo BertolottiColumbia University0.341.961–60.3+1.621.025%
Jay SpectorGeorge Washington University1.522.843–12.3+1.320.641%
Julia PaxtonSUNY Maritime College2.793.075–24.7+0.280.159%
Matthew SchoeneSUNY Maritime College2.522.805–24.7+0.280.159%
Nick ValenteSUNY Maritime College3.483.775–24.7+0.280.159%
Eddie CoxHobart and William Smith Colleges3.013.186–15.9+0.170.069%
William GodfreyHobart and William Smith Colleges2.772.946–15.9+0.170.069%
Elliott MorrillHobart and William Smith Colleges3.063.226–15.9+0.170.069%
Daniel DelbelloGeorge Washington University2.752.883–42.9+0.130.063%
Colin KennedyGeorge Washington University2.142.273–42.9+0.130.063%
Griffin OrrUniversity of Buffalo2.781.941–61.4−0.850.293%
Andrew GreenUniversity of Buffalo0.74-0.111–61.4−0.850.293%
Ryan BaileyWashington College3.021.714–35.3−1.311.397%
Max NeubeltU. S. Merchant Marine Academy2.420.161–62.5−2.262.399%
Austin NeumanU. S. Merchant Marine Academy1.59-0.671–62.5−2.262.399%
Charles SkordU. S. Merchant Marine Academy1.81-0.441–62.5−2.262.399%
Brendan ShanahanGeorge Washington University2.77-0.230–30.6≤−3.000.8>99%
Eric SiegelWashington College2.56-1.211–32.6−3.783.1>99%

Match by match

Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).

Rd#WinnerLoser P(winner)
11Hobart and William Smith CollegesU. S. Merchant Marine Academy98%
12SUNY Maritime CollegeGeorge Washington University76%
13Cornell UniversityUniversity of Buffalo98%
14Washington CollegeColumbia University100%
15Hobart and William Smith CollegesGeorge Washington University89%
16Cornell UniversityU. S. Merchant Marine Academy94%
17SUNY Maritime CollegeWashington College38%upset
18University of BuffaloColumbia University86%
19Cornell UniversityGeorge Washington University80%
110Hobart and William Smith CollegesWashington College61%
111U. S. Merchant Marine AcademyUniversity of Buffalo75%
112SUNY Maritime CollegeColumbia University100%
113Cornell UniversityWashington College43%upset
114George Washington UniversityUniversity of Buffalo77%
115Hobart and William Smith CollegesSUNY Maritime College73%
116Columbia UniversityU. S. Merchant Marine Academy6%upset
117Washington CollegeUniversity of Buffalo97%
118Cornell UniversitySUNY Maritime College56%
119George Washington UniversityU. S. Merchant Marine Academy51%
120Hobart and William Smith CollegesColumbia University100%
121SUNY Maritime CollegeUniversity of Buffalo97%
122Washington CollegeU. S. Merchant Marine Academy90%
123Cornell UniversityHobart and William Smith Colleges32%upset
124George Washington UniversityColumbia University94%
125SUNY Maritime CollegeU. S. Merchant Marine Academy91%
126Hobart and William Smith CollegesUniversity of Buffalo99%
127Washington CollegeGeorge Washington University90%
128Cornell UniversityColumbia University100%

Round 1

TeamRec.RedStatesmenPrivateersShoremenColonialsMarinersLionsBulls
Cornell University Big Red7–0✕WWWWWWW
Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen6–1L✕WWWWWW
SUNY Maritime College Privateers5–2LL✕WWWWW
Washington College Shoremen4–3LLL✕WWWW
George Washington University Colonials3–4LLLL✕WWW
U. S. Merchant Marine Academy Mariners1–6LLLLL✕LW
Columbia University Lions1–6LLLLLW✕L
University of Buffalo Bulls1–6LLLLLLW✕
# Winner Loser Pos.
1 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 1-2-3 def. U. S. Merchant Marine Academy Mariners 4-5-6
2 SUNY Maritime College Privateers 1-2-3 def. George Washington University Colonials 4-5-6
3 Cornell University Big Red 1-2-4 def. University of Buffalo Bulls 3-5-6
4 Washington College Shoremen 1-2-5 def. Columbia University Lions 3-4-6
5 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 1-2-5 def. George Washington University Colonials 3-4-6
6 Cornell University Big Red 2-3-5 def. U. S. Merchant Marine Academy Mariners 1-4-6
7 SUNY Maritime College Privateers 1-2-4 def. Washington College Shoremen 3-5-6
8 University of Buffalo Bulls 1-3-5 def. Columbia University Lions 2-4-6
9 Cornell University Big Red 1-2-5 def. George Washington University Colonials 3-4-6
10 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 1-2-4 def. Washington College Shoremen 3-5-6
11 U. S. Merchant Marine Academy Mariners 1-2-3 def. University of Buffalo Bulls 4-5-6
12 SUNY Maritime College Privateers 1-2-4 def. Columbia University Lions 3-5-6
13 Cornell University Big Red 1-2-5 def. Washington College Shoremen 3-4-6
14 George Washington University Colonials 1-2-3 def. University of Buffalo Bulls 4-5-6
15 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 1-2-5 def. SUNY Maritime College Privateers 3-4-6
16 Columbia University Lions 2-3-5 def. U. S. Merchant Marine Academy Mariners 1-4-6
17 Washington College Shoremen 1-2-4 def. University of Buffalo Bulls 3-5-6
18 Cornell University Big Red 1-2-6 def. SUNY Maritime College Privateers 3-4-5
19 George Washington University Colonials 1-3-5 def. U. S. Merchant Marine Academy Mariners 2-4-6
20 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 1-2-4 def. Columbia University Lions 3-5-6
21 SUNY Maritime College Privateers 1-2-4 def. University of Buffalo Bulls 3-5-6
22 Washington College Shoremen 1-2-6 def. U. S. Merchant Marine Academy Mariners 3-4-5
23 Cornell University Big Red 1-2-6 def. Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 3-4-5
24 George Washington University Colonials 1-2-3 def. Columbia University Lions 4-5-6
25 SUNY Maritime College Privateers 1-2-5 def. U. S. Merchant Marine Academy Mariners 3-4-6
26 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Statesmen 1-2-4 def. University of Buffalo Bulls 3-5-6
27 Washington College Shoremen 1-2-6 def. George Washington University Colonials 3-4-5
28 Cornell University Big Red 1-2-5 def. Columbia University Lions 3-4-6

Conditions — 03/29/2014 (8am–6pm)

☁️Overcast
Humidity 70%  ·  Pressure 1020.8 hPa

Temperature

41°F
↑ 48°F   ↓ 33°F
Feels like 35°F

Wind

● from   ▲ toward
5.1 kn
avg  ·  max 6.7 kn
Gusts to 14.4 kn
From NE (44°)

Sky & Precipitation

Cloud cover99% Sunshine6.3 hrs Humidity70% Pressure1020.8 hPa Rain0.03 in

What this breeze does at Hobart & William Sm — from fleet racing

Breeze: NE about 8 kn (weather reanalysis in the scorer’s units)
In fleet races at Hobart & William Sm in this breeze: an underdogs’ day (−0.07)
Underdogs’ conditions: in fleet racing here the fleet bunches up and lower-rated boats beat the seeds more often than usual.

Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.07 means a rating gap counts about 6% less than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.

Orderliness beyond the fleet at Hobart & William Sm by wind direction (angle) and speed (rings), fitted surface; dots are labelled regatta-days, ★ this regatta (30 labelled fleet-race days at Hobart & William Sm).

From the notes

Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.

All notes →