| # | School | Team | A | B | TOT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tufts University | Jumbos | 40 | 14 | 54 | |
| 2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Engineers | 44 | 18 | 62 | |
| 3 | Boston College | Eagles | 28 | 36 | 64 | |
| 4 | University of Vermont | Catamounts | 33 | 33 | 66 | |
| 5 | Bowdoin College | Polar Bears | 46 | 32 | 78 | |
| 6 | University of Rhode Island | Rams | 44 | 39 | 83 | |
| 7 | Salve Regina University | Seahawks | 40 | 45 | 85 | |
| 8 | Harvard University | Crimson | 35 | 55 | 90 | |
| 9 | Johnson and Wales University | Wildcats | 43 | 51 | 94 | |
| 10 | Stanford University | Cardinal | 35 | 60 | 95 | |
| 11 | Boston University | Terriers | 44 | 54 | 98 | |
| 12 | Brown University | Bears | 61 | 37 | 98 | |
| 13 | U. S. Coast Guard Academy | Bears | 53 | 63 | 116 |
| Team | 1A | 2A | 3A | 4A | 5A | 6A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boston College Eagles | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | |
| Boston University Terriers | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | |
| Bowdoin College Polar Bears | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 | |
| Brown University Bears | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | |
| U. S. Coast Guard Academy Bears | 11 | 11 | 13 | 13 | 2 | 2 | |
| Harvard University Crimson | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 9 | |
| Johnson and Wales University Wildcats | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 10 | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers | 7 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 11 | 11 | |
| University of Rhode Island Rams | 12 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | |
| Salve Regina University Seahawks | 8 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 12 | |
| Stanford University Cardinal | 9 | 9 | 11 | 11 | 13 | 13 | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 10 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 1 | |
| University of Vermont Catamounts | 13 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| Team | 1B | 2B | 3B | 4B | 5B | 6B | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boston College Eagles | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | |
| Boston University Terriers | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 | |
| Bowdoin College Polar Bears | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | |
| Brown University Bears | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 9 | |
| U. S. Coast Guard Academy Bears | 12 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | |
| Harvard University Crimson | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 10 | |
| Johnson and Wales University Wildcats | 7 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 11 | 11 | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers | 8 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 12 | |
| University of Rhode Island Rams | 13 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | |
| Salve Regina University Seahawks | 9 | 9 | 11 | 11 | 13 | 13 | |
| Stanford University Cardinal | 10 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 1 | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 11 | 11 | 13 | 13 | 2 | 2 | |
| University of Vermont Catamounts | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
Orderliness is how tightly the finishing order followed the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0). Positive is the favourites’ day: the ratings carried more weight than usual and the top seeds finished where expected. Negative is the underdogs’ day: the fleet compressed and the favourites came back to the pack. A value of ±0.01 means a rating gap counts about 1% more than on a typical day.
The breeze reading is the chart’s value at this regatta’s wind direction and speed (the star): this venue’s pattern of which directions bring order and which bring upsets, with breeze generally orderly and light air surprising. The fleet adjustment comes from the entry list: the stronger and more experienced the fleet, the more surprising the racing. How this is estimated · compare venues.
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.