| # | School | Team | Rec. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Roger Williams University | Hawks 1 | 18–3 | |
| 2 | University of Rhode Island | Rams | 15–6 | |
| 3 | Brown University | Bears | 15–6 | |
| 4 | Bowdoin College | Polar Bears | 12–9 | |
| 5 | Tufts University | Jumbos | 10–11 | |
| 6 | Roger Williams University | Hawks 2 | 7–14 | |
| 7 | Northeastern University | Huskies | 5–16 | |
| 8 | University of Vermont | Catamounts | 2–19 |
Each side is the sum of its three boats (the skipper's fleet rating times 0.72 plus a team race offset learned from their past matches, plus the crew's offset and a small experience term) plus the school's team race strength and a home-water edge for the host. The win probability is a logistic function of the difference. The forecast was made before the event: the model was refitted on every match sailed before the first day, with fleet ratings as of the week before.
Fitted on the 16,158 team race matches sailed before 2022-03-05, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 69 of 84 matches (82%) with a log-loss of 0.482 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went about as expected for the forecast. Orderliness +0.16 ± 0.22: a typical event, more orderly than 62% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.
For each side, the performance strength is the value that would have made its record least surprising: the strength at which the model's expected wins over exactly these opponents equal the actual wins, with every opponent fixed at its pre-event strength. For a skipper, the same shift is applied only to their boat in the matches they sailed, with team-mates and opponents fixed; team-mates who sailed every match together therefore get the same number. Surprise is in bits: -log2 of the probability of the record at the pre-event strength minus the same at the performance strength. P(this good or better) treats matches as independent coin flips at the model's pre-event probabilities, so it ignores form within the day; read it as a rough guide.
Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.
| Place | School | Strength | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Tufts University Jumbos | 6.54 | 7.37 | 10–11 | 6.8 | +0.84 | 2.0 | 7% |
| 1 | Roger Williams University Hawks 1 | 8.57 | 9.22 | 18–3 | 16.1 | +0.64 | 0.8 | 24% |
| 3 | Brown University Bears | 7.86 | 8.21 | 15–6 | 13.7 | +0.35 | 0.3 | 34% |
| 2 | University of Rhode Island Rams | 8.14 | 8.28 | 15–6 | 14.5 | +0.14 | 0.1 | 50% |
| 7 | Northeastern University Huskies | 6.36 | 5.91 | 5–16 | 6.5 | −0.45 | 0.5 | 86% |
| 8 | University of Vermont Catamounts | 5.46 | 4.98 | 2–19 | 3.0 | −0.48 | 0.3 | 83% |
| 4 | Bowdoin College Polar Bears | 8.06 | 7.52 | 12–9 | 14.1 | −0.54 | 0.8 | 91% |
| 6 | Roger Williams University Hawks 2 | 7.11 | 6.50 | 7–14 | 9.4 | −0.61 | 1.0 | 93% |
| Skipper | School | Value | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abbie Carlson | Tufts University | 2.28 | 3.11 | 10–11 | 6.8 | +0.84 | 2.0 | 7% |
| Alexandra Talbot | Tufts University | 2.05 | 2.89 | 10–11 | 6.8 | +0.84 | 2.0 | 7% |
| George Higham | Roger Williams University | 2.75 | 3.39 | 18–3 | 16.1 | +0.64 | 0.8 | 24% |
| William George | Brown University | 2.25 | 2.68 | 12–3 | 11.0 | +0.43 | 0.3 | 39% |
| Thomas Styron | Brown University | 2.33 | 2.76 | 12–3 | 11.0 | +0.43 | 0.3 | 39% |
| Jed Bell | Brown University | 2.91 | 3.27 | 15–6 | 13.7 | +0.35 | 0.3 | 34% |
| Ben Rosenberg | University of Rhode Island | 2.83 | 2.97 | 15–6 | 14.5 | +0.14 | 0.1 | 50% |
| Kerem Erkmen | University of Rhode Island | 2.72 | 2.86 | 15–6 | 14.5 | +0.14 | 0.1 | 50% |
| Elizabeth Kaplan | Bowdoin College | 2.20 | 2.27 | 5–1 | 4.9 | +0.08 | 0.0 | 71% |
| Joshua Dillon | Northeastern University | 1.62 | 1.17 | 5–16 | 6.5 | −0.45 | 0.5 | 86% |
| Will Priebe | Northeastern University | 1.99 | 1.53 | 5–16 | 6.5 | −0.45 | 0.5 | 86% |
| Michaela Odonnell | Roger Williams University | 1.75 | 1.28 | 7–11 | 8.6 | −0.47 | 0.5 | 87% |
| Audrey Commerford | University of Vermont | 2.13 | 1.64 | 2–19 | 3.0 | −0.48 | 0.3 | 83% |
| Elizabeth Amelotte | University of Vermont | 0.93 | 0.44 | 2–19 | 3.0 | −0.48 | 0.3 | 83% |
| Grace Gear | University of Vermont | 1.88 | 1.39 | 2–19 | 3.0 | −0.48 | 0.3 | 83% |
Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).
| Team | Rec. | 1 | Rams | Bears | Bears | Jumbos | 2 | Huskies | Catamounts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Williams University Hawks 1 | 9–5 | ✕ | L | L | W | W | ✕ | W | W | |
| University of Rhode Island Rams | 5–2 | W | ✕ | W | L | W | W | W | W | |
| Brown University Bears | 5–2 | W | L | ✕ | L | W | W | W | W | |
| Bowdoin College Polar Bears | 4–3 | L | W | W | ✕ | W | L | L | W | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 3–4 | L | L | L | L | ✕ | L | W | W | |
| Roger Williams University Hawks 2 | 9–5 | ✕ | L | L | W | W | ✕ | W | W | |
| Northeastern University Huskies | 1–6 | L | L | L | W | L | L | ✕ | L | |
| University of Vermont Catamounts | 1–6 | L | L | L | L | L | L | W | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | 1 | Rams | Bears | Bears | Jumbos | 2 | Huskies | Catamounts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Williams University Hawks 1 | 9–5 | ✕ | L | W | W | W | ✕ | W | W | |
| University of Rhode Island Rams | 6–1 | W | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Brown University Bears | 5–2 | L | L | ✕ | W | W | L | W | W | |
| Bowdoin College Polar Bears | 4–3 | L | L | L | ✕ | W | L | W | W | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 3–4 | L | L | L | L | ✕ | L | W | W | |
| Roger Williams University Hawks 2 | 9–5 | ✕ | L | W | W | W | ✕ | W | W | |
| Northeastern University Huskies | 1–6 | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | |
| University of Vermont Catamounts | 0–7 | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | 1 | Rams | Bears | Bears | Jumbos | 2 | Huskies | Catamounts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Williams University Hawks 1 | 7–7 | ✕ | W | L | L | W | ✕ | W | W | |
| University of Rhode Island Rams | 4–3 | L | ✕ | L | W | L | L | W | W | |
| Brown University Bears | 5–2 | W | W | ✕ | L | W | W | L | W | |
| Bowdoin College Polar Bears | 4–3 | W | L | W | ✕ | W | W | W | L | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 4–3 | L | W | L | L | ✕ | L | W | W | |
| Roger Williams University Hawks 2 | 7–7 | ✕ | W | L | L | W | ✕ | W | W | |
| Northeastern University Huskies | 3–4 | L | L | W | L | L | L | ✕ | W | |
| University of Vermont Catamounts | 1–6 | L | L | L | W | L | L | L | ✕ |
| # | Winner | Loser | Pos. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Polar Bears | 1-2-4 | def. | Catamounts | 3-5-6 | ||
| 2 | Jumbos | 1-2-4 | def. | Huskies | 3-5-6 | ||
| 3 | Rams | 2-3-4 | def. | Bears | 1-5-6 | ||
| 4 | Hawks 1 | 1-2-6 | def. | Hawks 2 | 3-4-5 | ||
| 5 | Huskies | 1-2-4 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 6 | Bears | 1-2-3 | def. | Catamounts | 4-5-6 | ||
| 7 | Jumbos | 1-5-6 | def. | Hawks 2 | 2-3-4 DSQ | ||
| 8 | Hawks 1 | 1-2-4 | def. | Rams | 3-5-6 | ||
| 9 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Huskies | 3-4-6 | ||
| 10 | Hawks 2 | 1-3-5 | def. | Polar Bears | 2-4-6 | ||
| 11 | Rams | 1-2-3 | def. | Catamounts | 4-5-6 | ||
| 12 | Hawks 1 | 1-2-3 | def. | Jumbos | 4-5-6 | ||
| 13 | Bears | 1-2-6 | def. | Hawks 2 | 3-4-5 | ||
| 14 | Rams | 1-2-4 | def. | Huskies | 3-5-6 | ||
| 15 | Polar Bears | 1-2-4 | def. | Jumbos | 3-5-6 | ||
| 16 | Hawks 1 | 1-2-3 | def. | Catamounts | 4-5-6 | ||
| 17 | Rams | 1-3-5 | def. | Hawks 2 | 2-4-6 | ||
| 18 | Bears | 1-2-3 | def. | Jumbos | 4-5-6 | ||
| 19 | Catamounts | 1-3-6 | def. | Huskies | 2-4-5 | ||
| 20 | Hawks 1 | 1-2-5 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 21 | Rams | 1-2-4 | def. | Jumbos | 3-5-6 | ||
| 22 | Hawks 2 | 1-2-5 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-6 | ||
| 23 | Polar Bears | 1-2-6 | def. | Bears | 3-4-5 | ||
| 24 | Hawks 1 | 1-2-3 | def. | Huskies | 4-5-6 | ||
| 25 | Jumbos | 1-2-3 | def. | Catamounts | 4-5-6 | ||
| 26 | Polar Bears | 1-3-6 | def. | Rams | 2-4-5 | ||
| 27 | Hawks 2 | 1-2-6 | def. | Huskies | 3-4-5 | ||
| 28 | Bears | 1-2-3 | def. | Hawks 1 | 4-5-6 | ||
| 29 | Polar Bears | 1-2-6 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-5 | ||
| 30 | Jumbos | 1-4-5 | def. | Huskies | 2-3-6 | ||
| 31 | Rams | 2-3-4 DSQ | def. | Bears | 1-5-6 DSQ | ||
| 32 | Hawks 1 | 1-2-3 | def. | Hawks 2 | 4-5-6 | ||
| 33 | Polar Bears | 1-2-6 | def. | Huskies | 3-4-5 | ||
| 34 | Bears | 1-2-4 | def. | Catamounts | 3-5-6 | ||
| 35 | Jumbos | 1-3-5 | def. | Hawks 2 | 2-4-6 | ||
| 36 | Hawks 1 | 1-3-6 | def. | Rams | 2-4-5 | ||
| 37 | Bears | 1-2-4 | def. | Huskies | 3-5-6 | ||
| 38 | Polar Bears | 1-2-6 | def. | Hawks 2 | 3-4-5 | ||
| 39 | Rams | 1-2-3 | def. | Catamounts | 4-5-6 | ||
| 40 | Hawks 1 | 1-4-5 | def. | Jumbos | 2-3-6 | ||
| 41 | Bears | 1-2-4 | def. | Hawks 2 | 3-5-6 | ||
| 42 | Rams | 1-3-6 | def. | Huskies | 2-4-5 | ||
| 43 | Polar Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-6 | ||
| 44 | Hawks 1 | 1-2-3 | def. | Catamounts | 4-5-6 | ||
| 45 | Rams | 1-2-3 | def. | Hawks 2 | 4-5-6 | ||
| 46 | Bears | 1-2-3 | def. | Jumbos | 4-5-6 | ||
| 47 | Huskies | 1-3-6 | def. | Catamounts | 2-4-5 | ||
| 48 | Hawks 1 | 1-2-3 | def. | Polar Bears | 4-5-6 | ||
| 49 | Rams | 1-2-5 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-6 | ||
| 50 | Hawks 2 | 1-2-6 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-5 | ||
| 51 | Bears | 1-2-4 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 52 | Hawks 1 | 1-2-5 | def. | Huskies | 3-4-6 | ||
| 53 | Jumbos | 1-2-3 | def. | Catamounts | 4-5-6 | ||
| 54 | Rams | 3-4-6 | def. | Polar Bears | 1-2-5 DSQ | ||
| 55 | Hawks 2 | 2-3-5 | def. | Huskies | 1-4-6 | ||
| 56 | Hawks 1 | 1-2-3 | def. | Bears | 4-5-6 | ||
| 57 | Polar Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-6 | ||
| 58 | Huskies | 1-4-5 | def. | Bears | 2-3-6 | ||
| 59 | Rams | 1-2-3 | def. | Hawks 2 | 4-5-6 | ||
| 60 | Hawks 1 | 1-3-4 | def. | Catamounts | 2-5-6 | ||
| 61 | Polar Bears | 1-2-6 | def. | Bears | 3-4-5 | ||
| 62 | Jumbos | 1-2-5 | def. | Rams | 3-4-6 | ||
| 63 | Huskies | 1-2-5 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-6 | ||
| 64 | Hawks 1 | 1-2-3 | def. | Hawks 2 | 4-5-6 | ||
| 65 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Rams | 3-4-6 | ||
| 66 | Catamounts | 1-2-6 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-4-5 | ||
| 67 | Jumbos | 1-4-5 | def. | Hawks 2 | 2-3-6 | ||
| 68 | Huskies | 1-2-6 | def. | Hawks 1 | 3-4-5 | ||
| 69 | Rams | 1-2-6 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-5 | ||
| 70 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Hawks 2 | 3-4-6 | ||
| 71 | Polar Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Huskies | 3-4-6 | ||
| 72 | Hawks 1 | 1-2-6 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-5 | ||
| 73 | Hawks 2 | 1-2-5 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-6 | ||
| 74 | Rams | 1-3-4 | def. | Huskies | 2-5-6 | ||
| 75 | Bears | 2-3-4 | def. | Jumbos | 1-5-6 | ||
| 76 | Hawks 1 | 2-3-4 | def. | Polar Bears | 1-5-6 | ||
| 77 | Hawks 2 | 1-2-5 | def. | Huskies | 3-4-6 | ||
| 78 | Jumbos | 1-2-6 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-5 | ||
| 79 | Rams | 2-3-4 | def. | Polar Bears | 1-5-6 | ||
| 80 | Bears | 1-3-4 | def. | Hawks 1 | 2-5-6 | ||
| 81 | Jumbos | 1-4-5 | def. | Huskies | 2-3-6 | ||
| 82 | Polar Bears | 1-2-3 | def. | Hawks 2 | 4-5-6 | ||
| 83 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-6 | ||
| 84 | Hawks 1 | 1-2-4 | def. | Rams | 3-5-6 | ||
Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.05 means a rating gap counts about 4% less than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.