| # | School | Team | Rec. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Roger Williams University | Hawks | 13–3 | |
| 2 | Yale University | Bulldogs | 13–3 | |
| 3 | Boston College | Eagles | 11–5 | |
| 4 | Tufts University | Jumbos | 11–5 | |
| 5 | Dartmouth College | Big Green | 8–8 | |
| 6 | Harvard University | Crimson | 7–9 | |
| 7 | Brown University | Bears | 5–6 | |
| 8 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Engineers | 4–7 | |
| 9 | Connecticut College | Camels | 3–8 | |
| 10 | U. S. Coast Guard Academy | Bears | 3–8 | |
| 11 | University of Vermont | Catamounts | 2–9 | |
| 12 | Bowdoin College | Polar Bears | 1–10 |
Each side is the sum of its three boats (the skipper's fleet rating times 0.72 plus a team race offset learned from their past matches, plus the crew's offset and a small experience term) plus the school's team race strength and a home-water edge for the host. The win probability is a logistic function of the difference. The forecast was made before the event: the model was refitted on every match sailed before the first day, with fleet ratings as of the week before.
Fitted on the 3,412 team race matches sailed before 2014-04-05, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 58 of 81 matches (72%) with a log-loss of 0.545 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went about as expected for the forecast. Orderliness +0.11 ± 0.25: a typical event, more orderly than 55% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.
For each side, the performance strength is the value that would have made its record least surprising: the strength at which the model's expected wins over exactly these opponents equal the actual wins, with every opponent fixed at its pre-event strength. For a skipper, the same shift is applied only to their boat in the matches they sailed, with team-mates and opponents fixed; team-mates who sailed every match together therefore get the same number. Surprise is in bits: -log2 of the probability of the record at the pre-event strength minus the same at the performance strength. P(this good or better) treats matches as independent coin flips at the model's pre-event probabilities, so it ignores form within the day; read it as a rough guide.
Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.
| Place | School | Strength | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Roger Williams University | 10.98 | 12.51 | 13–3 | 8.6 | +1.53 | 4.5 | 1% |
| 4 | Tufts University | 10.85 | 11.74 | 11–5 | 8.1 | +0.89 | 1.8 | 10% |
| 10 | U. S. Coast Guard Academy | 8.99 | 9.66 | 3–8 | 1.8 | +0.67 | 0.6 | 27% |
| 8 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | 9.59 | 9.99 | 4–7 | 3.2 | +0.40 | 0.2 | 39% |
| 3 | Boston College | 11.52 | 11.64 | 11–5 | 10.6 | +0.12 | 0.0 | 54% |
| 6 | Harvard University | 10.53 | 10.59 | 7–9 | 6.8 | +0.06 | 0.0 | 56% |
| 2 | Yale University | 12.45 | 12.25 | 13–3 | 13.4 | −0.20 | 0.1 | 76% |
| 5 | Dartmouth College | 11.12 | 10.71 | 8–8 | 9.4 | −0.42 | 0.4 | 85% |
| 7 | Brown University | 11.03 | 10.35 | 5–6 | 6.6 | −0.68 | 0.8 | 92% |
| 9 | Connecticut College | 10.16 | 9.45 | 3–8 | 4.5 | −0.71 | 0.7 | 91% |
| 11 | University of Vermont | 10.24 | 8.88 | 2–9 | 4.6 | −1.36 | 2.3 | 99% |
| 12 | Bowdoin College | 9.67 | 7.97 | 1–10 | 3.4 | −1.70 | 2.5 | 99% |
Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).
| Team | Rec. | Hawks | Bulldogs | Eagles | Jumbos | Green | Crimson | Bears | Engineers | Camels | Bears | Catamounts | Bears | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Williams University Hawks | 10–1 | ✕ | W | W | L | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Yale University Bulldogs | 9–2 | L | ✕ | W | L | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Boston College Eagles | 7–4 | L | L | ✕ | W | L | W | W | L | W | W | W | W | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 8–3 | W | W | L | ✕ | W | L | W | W | W | W | W | L | |
| Dartmouth College Big Green | 8–3 | L | L | W | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Harvard University Crimson | 6–5 | L | L | L | W | L | ✕ | L | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Brown University Bears | 5–6 | L | L | L | L | L | W | ✕ | W | W | L | W | W | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers | 4–7 | L | L | W | L | L | L | L | ✕ | L | W | W | W | |
| Connecticut College Camels | 3–8 | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | W | ✕ | W | L | W | |
| U. S. Coast Guard Academy Bears | 3–8 | L | L | L | L | L | L | W | L | L | ✕ | W | W | |
| University of Vermont Catamounts | 2–9 | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | W | L | ✕ | W | |
| Bowdoin College Polar Bears | 1–10 | L | L | L | W | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Hawks | Bulldogs | Eagles | Jumbos | Green | Crimson | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Williams University Hawks | 3–2 | ✕ | W | L | L | W | W | |
| Yale University Bulldogs | 4–1 | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | |
| Boston College Eagles | 4–1 | W | L | ✕ | W | W | W | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 3–2 | W | L | L | ✕ | W | W | |
| Dartmouth College Big Green | 0–5 | L | L | L | L | ✕ | L | |
| Harvard University Crimson | 1–4 | L | L | L | L | W | ✕ |
| # | Winner | Loser | Pos. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Camels | 1-2-6 | def. | Bears | 3-4-5 | ||
| 2 | Crimson | 1-2-5 | def. | Engineers | 3-4-6 | ||
| 3 | Hawks | 1-4-5 | def. | Big Green | 2-3-6 | ||
| 4 | Jumbos | 1-2-5 | def. | Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 5 | Catamounts | 1-2-5 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 6 | Bulldogs | 1-2-6 | def. | Eagles | 3-4-5 | ||
| 7 | Crimson | 1-2-5 | def. | Camels | 3-4-6 | ||
| 8 | Big Green | 2-3-4 | def. | Bears | 1-5-6 | ||
| 9 | Bears | 1-2-4 | def. | Engineers | 3-5-6 | ||
| 10 | Hawks | 1-2-5 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 11 | Jumbos | 2-3-4 | def. | Bulldogs | 1-5-6 | ||
| 12 | Eagles | 1-2-4 | def. | Catamounts | 3-5-6 | ||
| 13 | Big Green | 2-3-4 | def. | Crimson | 1-5-6 | ||
| 14 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Camels | 3-4-6 | ||
| 15 | Bears | 1-2-4 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 16 | Bulldogs | 1-2-5 | def. | Engineers | 3-4-6 | ||
| 17 | Hawks | 1-3-5 | def. | Catamounts | 2-4-6 | ||
| 18 | Eagles | 1-3-6 | def. | Jumbos | 2-4-5 | ||
| 19 | Big Green | 2-3-5 | def. | Bears | 1-4-6 | ||
| 20 | Crimson | 1-2-5 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 21 | Bulldogs | 1-2-4 | def. | Camels | 3-5-6 | ||
| 22 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-6 | ||
| 23 | Jumbos | 1-2-4 | def. | Engineers | 3-5-6 | ||
| 24 | Hawks | 1-2-6 | def. | Eagles | 3-4-5 | ||
| 25 | Bears | 1-2-4 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 26 | Bulldogs | 1-2-3 | def. | Big Green | 4-5-6 | ||
| 27 | Crimson | 1-2-6 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-5 | ||
| 28 | Jumbos | 1-2-6 | def. | Camels | 3-4-5 | ||
| 29 | Hawks | 1-2-4 | def. | Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 30 | Engineers | 3-4-6 | def. | Eagles | 1-2-5 DSQ | ||
| 31 | Bulldogs | 1-2-4 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 32 | Bears | 1-3-5 | def. | Catamounts | 2-4-6 | ||
| 33 | Jumbos | 1-2-4 | def. | Big Green | 3-5-6 | ||
| 34 | Hawks | 2-3-4 | def. | Crimson | 1-5-6 | ||
| 35 | Camels | 1-2-6 | def. | Engineers | 3-4-5 | ||
| 36 | Eagles | 1-2-3 | def. | Bears | 4-5-6 | ||
| 37 | Bulldogs | 1-2-5 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-6 | ||
| 38 | Polar Bears | 1-2-6 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-5 | ||
| 39 | Hawks | 2-3-4 | def. | Bears | 1-5-6 | ||
| 40 | Big Green | 1-3-5 | def. | Engineers | 2-4-6 | ||
| 41 | Crimson | 1-2-5 | def. | Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 42 | Eagles | 1-2-5 | def. | Camels | 3-4-6 | ||
| 43 | Jumbos | 1-2-3 | def. | Catamounts | 4-5-6 | ||
| 44 | Hawks | 2-3-5 | def. | Bulldogs | 1-4-6 | ||
| 45 | Engineers | 1-2-6 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-4-5 | ||
| 46 | Bears | 1-2-5 | def. | Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 47 | Big Green | 1-3-5 | def. | Camels | 2-4-6 | ||
| 48 | Eagles | 1-2-4 | def. | Crimson | 3-5-6 | ||
| 49 | Jumbos | 1-2-6 | def. | Hawks | 3-4-5 | ||
| 50 | Engineers | 1-2-4 | def. | Catamounts | 3-5-6 | ||
| 51 | Bulldogs | 1-2-4 | def. | Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 52 | Camels | 2-3-4 | def. | Polar Bears | 1-5-6 | ||
| 53 | Bears | 1-2-6 | def. | Crimson | 3-4-5 | ||
| 54 | Big Green | 1-3-5 | def. | Eagles | 2-4-6 | ||
| 55 | Hawks | 1-3-6 | def. | Engineers | 2-4-5 | ||
| 56 | Jumbos | 1-2-5 | def. | Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 57 | Catamounts | 2-3-4 | def. | Camels | 1-5-6 | ||
| 58 | Bulldogs | 1-2-6 | def. | Crimson | 3-4-5 | ||
| 59 | Big Green | 1-3-6 | def. | Polar Bears | 2-4-5 | ||
| 60 | Eagles | 2-3-4 | def. | Bears | 1-5-6 | ||
| 61 | Engineers | 1-4-5 | def. | Bears | 2-3-6 | ||
| 62 | Hawks | 1-3-5 | def. | Camels | 2-4-6 | ||
| 63 | Crimson | 1-2-5 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-6 | ||
| 64 | Big Green | 1-2-5 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-6 | ||
| 65 | Bulldogs | 1-2-5 | def. | Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 66 | Eagles | 1-2-5 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 67 | Jumbos | 1-2-6 | def. | Big Green | 3-4-5 | ||
| 68 | Bulldogs | 1-2-5 | def. | Eagles | 3-4-6 | ||
| 69 | Hawks | 1-2-4 | def. | Crimson | 3-5-6 | ||
| 70 | Bulldogs | 1-2-6 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-5 | ||
| 71 | Crimson | 1-2-5 | def. | Big Green | 3-4-6 | ||
| 72 | Eagles | 2-3-4 | def. | Hawks | 1-5-6 | ||
| 73 | Bulldogs | 1-4-5 | def. | Crimson | 2-3-6 | ||
| 74 | Eagles | 1-2-4 | def. | Jumbos | 3-5-6 | ||
| 75 | Hawks | 1-3-4 | def. | Big Green | 2-5-6 | ||
| 76 | Eagles | 1-2-3 | def. | Crimson | 4-5-6 | ||
| 77 | Bulldogs | 1-2-4 | def. | Big Green | 3-5-6 | ||
| 78 | Jumbos | 1-2-5 | def. | Hawks | 3-4-6 | ||
| 79 | Eagles | 2-3-5 | def. | Big Green | 1-4-6 | ||
| 80 | Jumbos | 1-2-6 | def. | Crimson | 3-4-5 | ||
| 81 | Hawks | 1-2-5 | def. | Bulldogs | 3-4-6 | ||
Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.08 means a rating gap counts about 7% less than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.