| # | School | Team | Rec. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Boston College | Eagles | 10–4 | |
| 2 | Roger Williams University | Hawks | 9–5 | |
| 3 | University of Vermont | Catamounts | 9–5 | |
| 4 | St. Mary's College of Maryland | Seahawks | 9–5 | |
| 5 | Connecticut College | Camels | 7–7 | |
| 6 | Harvard University | Crimson | 6–8 | |
| 7 | Washington College | Shoremen | 7–5 | |
| 8 | Boston University | Terriers | 6–6 | |
| 9 | U. S. Coast Guard Academy | Bears | 2–10 | |
| 10 | University of Michigan | Wolverines | 1–11 |
Each side is the sum of its three boats (the skipper's fleet rating times 0.72 plus a team race offset learned from their past matches, plus the crew's offset and a small experience term) plus the school's team race strength and a home-water edge for the host. The win probability is a logistic function of the difference. The forecast was made before the event: the model was refitted on every match sailed before the first day, with fleet ratings as of the week before.
Fitted on the 2,456 team race matches sailed before 2014-03-15, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 46 of 66 matches (70%) with a log-loss of 0.575 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went about as expected for the forecast. Orderliness −0.23 ± 0.25: a typical event, more orderly than 22% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.
For each side, the performance strength is the value that would have made its record least surprising: the strength at which the model's expected wins over exactly these opponents equal the actual wins, with every opponent fixed at its pre-event strength. For a skipper, the same shift is applied only to their boat in the matches they sailed, with team-mates and opponents fixed; team-mates who sailed every match together therefore get the same number. Surprise is in bits: -log2 of the probability of the record at the pre-event strength minus the same at the performance strength. P(this good or better) treats matches as independent coin flips at the model's pre-event probabilities, so it ignores form within the day; read it as a rough guide.
Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.
| Place | School | Strength | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Washington College | 8.40 | 10.13 | 7–5 | 3.4 | +1.73 | 4.7 | 1% |
| 3 | University of Vermont | 10.15 | 10.94 | 9–5 | 6.7 | +0.80 | 1.3 | 15% |
| 6 | Harvard University | 9.87 | 10.01 | 6–8 | 5.6 | +0.15 | 0.0 | 53% |
| 4 | St. Mary's College of Maryland | 10.89 | 11.01 | 9–5 | 8.7 | +0.12 | 0.0 | 55% |
| 2 | Roger Williams University | 11.10 | 11.06 | 9–5 | 9.1 | −0.04 | 0.0 | 65% |
| 8 | Boston University | 9.63 | 9.39 | 6–6 | 6.5 | −0.24 | 0.1 | 76% |
| 10 | University of Michigan | 7.68 | 7.22 | 1–11 | 1.5 | −0.46 | 0.1 | 81% |
| 1 | Boston College | 11.68 | 11.19 | 10–4 | 11.1 | −0.49 | 0.4 | 87% |
| 5 | Connecticut College | 10.90 | 10.20 | 7–7 | 8.9 | −0.70 | 1.0 | 93% |
| 9 | U. S. Coast Guard Academy | 9.03 | 7.50 | 2–10 | 4.4 | −1.53 | 2.5 | 99% |
Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).
| Team | Rec. | Eagles | Hawks | Catamounts | Seahawks | Camels | Crimson | Shoremen | Terriers | Bears | Wolverines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boston College Eagles | 6–3 | ✕ | W | L | W | W | W | W | L | W | L | |
| Roger Williams University Hawks | 6–3 | L | ✕ | W | W | L | W | L | W | W | W | |
| University of Vermont Catamounts | 6–3 | W | L | ✕ | W | L | W | W | L | W | W | |
| St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks | 6–3 | L | L | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Connecticut College Camels | 6–3 | L | W | W | L | ✕ | L | W | W | W | W | |
| Harvard University Crimson | 5–4 | L | L | L | L | W | ✕ | W | W | W | W | |
| Washington College Shoremen | 4–5 | L | W | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | W | W | |
| Boston University Terriers | 4–5 | W | L | W | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | W | |
| U. S. Coast Guard Academy Bears | 1–8 | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ | W | |
| University of Michigan Wolverines | 1–8 | W | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Eagles | Hawks | Catamounts | Seahawks | Camels | Crimson | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boston College Eagles | 4–1 | ✕ | L | W | W | W | W | |
| Roger Williams University Hawks | 3–2 | W | ✕ | L | W | L | W | |
| University of Vermont Catamounts | 3–2 | L | W | ✕ | L | W | W | |
| St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks | 3–2 | L | L | W | ✕ | W | W | |
| Connecticut College Camels | 1–4 | L | W | L | L | ✕ | L | |
| Harvard University Crimson | 1–4 | L | L | L | L | W | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Shoremen | Terriers | Bears | Wolverines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Washington College Shoremen | 3–0 | ✕ | W | W | W | |
| Boston University Terriers | 2–1 | L | ✕ | W | W | |
| U. S. Coast Guard Academy Bears | 1–2 | L | L | ✕ | W | |
| University of Michigan Wolverines | 0–3 | L | L | L | ✕ |
| # | Winner | Loser | Pos. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Camels | 1-2-3 | def. | Wolverines | 4-5-6 | ||
| 2 | Hawks | 1-2-5 | def. | Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 3 | Seahawks | 1-2-4 | def. | Crimson | 3-5-6 | ||
| 4 | Terriers | 1-2-5 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-6 | ||
| 5 | Eagles | 1-2-4 | def. | Shoremen | 3-5-6 | ||
| 6 | Camels | 1-2-6 | def. | Bears | 3-4-5 | ||
| 7 | Crimson | 1-2-3 | def. | Wolverines | 4-5-6 | ||
| 8 | Hawks | 1-3-4 | def. | Terriers | 2-5-6 | ||
| 9 | Seahawks | 1-2-5 | def. | Shoremen | 3-4-6 | ||
| 10 | Catamounts | 1-3-5 | def. | Eagles | 2-4-6 | ||
| 11 | Crimson | 1-4-5 | def. | Bears | 2-3-6 | ||
| 12 | Camels | 1-2-5 | def. | Terriers | 3-4-6 | ||
| 13 | Shoremen | 1-2-5 | def. | Wolverines | 3-4-6 | ||
| 14 | Hawks | 1-2-3 | def. | Catamounts | 4-5-6 | ||
| 15 | Eagles | 1-4-5 | def. | Seahawks | 2-3-6 | ||
| 16 | Crimson | 2-3-4 | def. | Terriers | 1-5-6 | ||
| 17 | Shoremen | 1-2-5 | def. | Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 18 | Camels | 1-2-6 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-5 | ||
| 19 | Seahawks | 1-2-3 | def. | Wolverines | 4-5-6 | ||
| 20 | Eagles | 2-3-4 | def. | Hawks | 1-5-6 | ||
| 21 | Shoremen | 1-3-4 | def. | Terriers | 2-5-6 | ||
| 22 | Catamounts | 1-4-5 | def. | Crimson | 2-3-6 | ||
| 23 | Seahawks | 1-2-6 | def. | Bears | 3-4-5 | ||
| 24 | Camels | 1-2-6 | def. | Hawks | 3-4-5 | ||
| 25 | Wolverines | 1-2-6 | def. | Eagles | 3-4-5 | ||
| 26 | Catamounts | 2-3-5 | def. | Shoremen | 1-4-6 | ||
| 27 | Seahawks | 1-2-4 | def. | Terriers | 3-5-6 | ||
| 28 | Hawks | 1-3-4 | def. | Crimson | 2-5-6 | ||
| 29 | Bears | 1-2-3 | def. | Wolverines | 4-5-6 | ||
| 30 | Eagles | 1-2-5 | def. | Camels | 3-4-6 | ||
| 31 | Catamounts | 2-3-4 | def. | Seahawks | 1-5-6 | ||
| 32 | Shoremen | 1-3-5 | def. | Hawks | 2-4-6 | ||
| 33 | Terriers | 1-2-5 | def. | Wolverines | 3-4-6 | ||
| 34 | Crimson | 1-3-4 | def. | Camels | 2-5-6 | ||
| 35 | Eagles | 1-2-3 | def. | Bears | 4-5-6 | ||
| 36 | Hawks | 1-2-4 | def. | Seahawks | 3-5-6 | ||
| 37 | Catamounts | 1-2-4 | def. | Wolverines | 3-5-6 | ||
| 38 | Camels | 1-2-4 | def. | Shoremen | 3-5-6 | ||
| 39 | Terriers | 1-3-5 | def. | Bears | 2-4-6 | ||
| 40 | Eagles | 1-2-6 | def. | Crimson | 3-4-5 | ||
| 41 | Hawks | 1-2-6 | def. | Wolverines | 3-4-5 | ||
| 42 | Seahawks | 1-2-5 | def. | Camels | 3-4-6 | ||
| 43 | Catamounts | 1-2-6 | def. | Bears | 3-4-5 | ||
| 44 | Crimson | 1-3-4 | def. | Shoremen | 2-5-6 | ||
| 45 | Terriers | 1-2-3 | def. | Eagles | 4-5-6 | ||
| 46 | Hawks | 2-3-4 | def. | Seahawks | 1-5-6 | ||
| 47 | Catamounts | 1-2-4 | def. | Camels | 3-5-6 | ||
| 48 | Eagles | 1-2-4 | def. | Crimson | 3-5-6 | ||
| 49 | Camels | 2-3-4 | def. | Hawks | 1-5-6 | ||
| 50 | Seahawks | 1-3-5 | def. | Crimson | 2-4-6 | ||
| 51 | Eagles | 1-2-5 | def. | Catamounts | 3-4-6 | ||
| 52 | Crimson | 1-2-6 | def. | Camels | 3-4-5 | ||
| 53 | Catamounts | 1-4-5 | def. | Hawks | 2-3-6 | ||
| 54 | Eagles | 1-2-4 | def. | Seahawks | 3-5-6 | ||
| 55 | Catamounts | 2-3-5 | def. | Crimson | 1-4-6 | ||
| 56 | Seahawks | 1-2-3 | def. | Camels | 4-5-6 | ||
| 57 | Hawks | 2-3-4 | def. | Eagles | 1-5-6 | ||
| 58 | Seahawks | 1-2-3 | def. | Catamounts | 4-5-6 | ||
| 59 | Hawks | 2-3-4 | def. | Crimson | 1-5-6 | ||
| 60 | Eagles | 1-2-5 | def. | Camels | 3-4-6 | ||
| 61 | Shoremen | 1-3-6 | def. | Terriers | 2-4-5 | ||
| 62 | Shoremen | 1-2-6 | def. | Bears | 3-4-5 | ||
| 63 | Shoremen | 1-3-6 | def. | Wolverines | 2-4-5 | ||
| 64 | Terriers | 2-3-4 | def. | Bears | 1-5-6 | ||
| 65 | Terriers | 1-2-3 | def. | Wolverines | 4-5-6 DNF | ||
| 66 | Bears | 1-2-6 | def. | Wolverines | 3-4-5 | ||
Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.06 means a rating gap counts about 5% less than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.