| # | School | Team | Rec. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brown University | Bears 1 | 17–2 | |
| 2 | Dartmouth College | Big Green | 14–5 | |
| 3 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Engineers | 13–6 | |
| 4 | Boston University | Terriers | 12–7 | |
| 5 | Brown University | Bears 2 | 12–7 | |
| 6 | Cornell University | Big Red | 11–8 | |
| 7 | University of Rhode Island | Rams | 7–12 | |
| 8 | Bowdoin College | Polar Bears | 6–13 | |
| 9 | University of South Florida | Bulls | 10–10 | |
| 10 | University of Pennsylvania | Quakers | 10–10 | |
| 11 | Harvard University | Crimson | 7–13 | |
| 12 | Northeastern University | Huskies | 4–16 | |
| 13 | Tufts University | Jumbos | 3–17 |
Each side is the sum of its three boats (the skipper's fleet rating times 0.72 plus a team race offset learned from their past matches, plus the crew's offset and a small experience term) plus the school's team race strength and a home-water edge for the host. The win probability is a logistic function of the difference. The forecast was made before the event: the model was refitted on every match sailed before the first day, with fleet ratings as of the week before.
Fitted on the 13,699 team race matches sailed before 2019-04-13, using the line-ups that actually raced. It called 99 of 126 matches (79%) with a log-loss of 0.508 (a coin flip scores 0.693), so the event went about as expected for the forecast. Orderliness −0.10 ± 0.17: a typical event, more orderly than 32% of college team race events (temperature of the forecast log-odds that best fits the results, relative to the league average; nothing about the field, venue or wind predicts it, see the Weather tab). vs forecast is a team's wins minus the wins the model expected from the matches it sailed: positive means it beat its rating.
For each side, the performance strength is the value that would have made its record least surprising: the strength at which the model's expected wins over exactly these opponents equal the actual wins, with every opponent fixed at its pre-event strength. For a skipper, the same shift is applied only to their boat in the matches they sailed, with team-mates and opponents fixed; team-mates who sailed every match together therefore get the same number. Surprise is in bits: -log2 of the probability of the record at the pre-event strength minus the same at the performance strength. P(this good or better) treats matches as independent coin flips at the model's pre-event probabilities, so it ignores form within the day; read it as a rough guide.
Pre-event strength against the strength that would have made each record least surprising, everything else fixed. Δ is in the model's logit units, the same scale as the boat values above (a side is three boats plus the school term); green is a clear over-performance, red a clear under-performance. Skippers need three or more matches.
| Place | School | Strength | Perf. | Record | Exp. wins | Δ | Surprise (bits) | P(this good or better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | University of South Florida Bulls | 6.93 | 7.74 | 10–10 | 7.3 | +0.80 | 1.6 | 11% |
| 5 | Brown University Bears 2 | 8.35 | 9.05 | 12–7 | 9.5 | +0.70 | 1.2 | 15% |
| 4 | Boston University Terriers | 8.54 | 9.08 | 12–7 | 10.1 | +0.54 | 0.7 | 23% |
| 7 | University of Rhode Island Rams | 7.30 | 7.70 | 7–12 | 5.7 | +0.40 | 0.4 | 32% |
| 12 | Northeastern University Huskies | 5.72 | 6.07 | 4–16 | 3.2 | +0.36 | 0.2 | 39% |
| 3 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers | 9.13 | 9.28 | 13–6 | 12.5 | +0.15 | 0.1 | 51% |
| 1 | Brown University Bears 1 | 10.57 | 10.60 | 17–2 | 16.9 | +0.04 | 0.0 | 66% |
| 2 | Dartmouth College Big Green | 9.50 | 9.52 | 14–5 | 14.0 | +0.01 | 0.0 | 62% |
| 13 | Tufts University Jumbos | 5.74 | 5.62 | 3–17 | 3.3 | −0.12 | 0.0 | 68% |
| 8 | Bowdoin College Polar Bears | 7.60 | 7.43 | 6–13 | 6.5 | −0.17 | 0.1 | 71% |
| 6 | Cornell University Big Red | 8.92 | 8.73 | 11–8 | 11.7 | −0.19 | 0.1 | 74% |
| 10 | University of Pennsylvania Quakers | 8.57 | 7.41 | 10–10 | 13.9 | −1.16 | 3.3 | 99% |
| 11 | Harvard University Crimson | 7.95 | 6.61 | 7–13 | 11.4 | −1.33 | 4.2 | >99% |
Probability the model gave the side that went on to win. Red bars are upsets (the winner was given under 50%).
| Team | Rec. | 1 | Green | Engineers | Terriers | 2 | Red | Rams | Bears | Bulls | Quakers | Crimson | Huskies | Jumbos | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brown University Bears 1 | 20–4 | ✕ | W | L | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Dartmouth College Big Green | 8–4 | L | ✕ | W | L | L | W | L | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers | 9–3 | W | L | ✕ | W | W | W | L | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Boston University Terriers | 9–3 | W | W | L | ✕ | W | L | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Brown University Bears 2 | 20–4 | ✕ | W | L | L | ✕ | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
| Cornell University Big Red | 7–5 | L | L | L | W | L | ✕ | W | L | W | W | W | L | W | |
| University of Rhode Island Rams | 5–7 | L | W | W | L | L | L | ✕ | L | W | L | L | W | W | |
| Bowdoin College Polar Bears | 6–6 | L | L | L | L | L | W | W | ✕ | L | W | W | W | W | |
| University of South Florida Bulls | 4–8 | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | W | ✕ | W | W | L | W | |
| University of Pennsylvania Quakers | 3–9 | L | L | L | L | L | L | W | L | L | ✕ | W | W | L | |
| Harvard University Crimson | 3–9 | L | L | L | L | L | L | W | L | L | L | ✕ | W | W | |
| Northeastern University Huskies | 3–9 | L | L | L | L | L | W | L | L | W | L | L | ✕ | W | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 1–11 | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | W | L | L | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | 1 | Green | Engineers | Terriers | 2 | Red | Rams | Bears | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brown University Bears 1 | 9–5 | ✕ | W | L | W | ✕ | L | W | W | |
| Dartmouth College Big Green | 6–1 | L | ✕ | W | W | L | W | W | W | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineers | 4–3 | W | L | ✕ | L | W | W | W | W | |
| Boston University Terriers | 3–4 | L | L | W | ✕ | L | L | L | W | |
| Brown University Bears 2 | 9–5 | ✕ | W | L | W | ✕ | L | W | W | |
| Cornell University Big Red | 4–3 | W | L | L | W | W | ✕ | W | W | |
| University of Rhode Island Rams | 2–5 | L | L | L | W | L | L | ✕ | W | |
| Bowdoin College Polar Bears | 0–7 | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Bulls | Quakers | Crimson | Huskies | Jumbos | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of South Florida Bulls | 3–1 | ✕ | L | W | W | W | |
| University of Pennsylvania Quakers | 4–0 | W | ✕ | W | W | W | |
| Harvard University Crimson | 2–2 | L | L | ✕ | W | W | |
| Northeastern University Huskies | 1–3 | L | L | L | ✕ | W | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 0–4 | L | L | L | L | ✕ |
| Team | Rec. | Bulls | Quakers | Crimson | Huskies | Jumbos | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of South Florida Bulls | 3–1 | ✕ | W | L | W | W | |
| University of Pennsylvania Quakers | 3–1 | L | ✕ | W | W | W | |
| Harvard University Crimson | 2–2 | W | L | ✕ | W | L | |
| Northeastern University Huskies | 0–4 | L | L | L | ✕ | L | |
| Tufts University Jumbos | 2–2 | L | L | W | W | ✕ |
| # | Winner | Loser | Pos. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bears 1 | 1-2-3 | def. | Polar Bears | 4-5-6 | ||
| 2 | Big Red | 1-3-6 | def. | Terriers | 2-4-5 | ||
| 3 | Bulls | 1-2-6 | def. | Crimson | 3-4-5 | ||
| 4 | Engineers | 1-2-3 | def. | Huskies | 4-5-6 | ||
| 5 | Jumbos | 1-4-5 | def. | Quakers | 2-3-6 | ||
| 6 | Bears 2 | 2-3-4 | def. | Rams | 1-5-6 | ||
| 7 | Big Green | 1-4-5 | def. | Polar Bears | 2-3-6 | ||
| 8 | Bears 1 | 1-2-6 | def. | Terriers | 3-4-5 | ||
| 9 | Big Red | 1-2-5 | def. | Bulls | 3-4-6 | ||
| 10 | Engineers | 1-2-4 | def. | Crimson | 3-5-6 | ||
| 11 | Huskies | 1-2-4 | def. | Jumbos | 3-5-6 | ||
| 12 | Quakers | 2-3-4 | def. | Rams | 1-5-6 | ||
| 13 | Bears 2 | 1-2-4 | def. | Big Green | 3-5-6 | ||
| 14 | Bears 1 | 1-2-5 | def. | Bulls | 3-4-6 | ||
| 15 | Big Red | 1-3-4 | def. | Crimson | 2-5-6 | ||
| 16 | Engineers | 1-3-5 | def. | Terriers | 2-4-6 | ||
| 17 | Quakers | 1-3-4 | def. | Huskies | 2-5-6 | ||
| 18 | Rams | 1-3-6 | def. | Big Green | 2-4-5 | ||
| 19 | Bulls | 1-2-3 | def. | Polar Bears | 4-5-6 | ||
| 20 | Big Red | 2-3-4 | def. | Bears 1 | 1-5-6 | ||
| 21 | Crimson | 1-2-4 | def. | Jumbos | 3-5-6 | ||
| 22 | Terriers | 1-3-4 | def. | Bears 2 | 2-5-6 | ||
| 23 | Engineers | 1-2-5 | def. | Quakers | 3-4-6 | ||
| 24 | Polar Bears | 1-3-6 | def. | Rams | 2-4-5 | ||
| 25 | Big Green | 1-2-4 | def. | Huskies | 3-5-6 | ||
| 26 | Bears 1 | 1-2-3 | def. | Jumbos | 4-5-6 | ||
| 27 | Bears 2 | 1-3-5 | def. | Crimson | 2-4-6 | ||
| 28 | Terriers | 1-2-3 | def. | Quakers | 4-5-6 | ||
| 29 | Engineers | 1-2-6 | def. | Big Red | 3-4-5 | ||
| 30 | Big Green | 1-2-5 | def. | Bulls | 3-4-6 | ||
| 31 | Rams | 1-2-3 | def. | Huskies | 4-5-6 | ||
| 32 | Polar Bears | 1-2-4 | def. | Jumbos | 3-5-6 | ||
| 33 | Bears 1 | 1-2-4 | def. | Bears 2 | 3-5-6 | ||
| 34 | Big Red | 1-2-5 | def. | Quakers | 3-4-6 | ||
| 35 | Engineers | 2-3-4 | def. | Bulls | 1-5-6 | ||
| 36 | Terriers | 2-3-4 | def. | Big Green | 1-5-6 | ||
| 37 | Polar Bears | 2-3-4 | def. | Crimson | 1-5-6 | ||
| 38 | Rams | 1-2-3 | def. | Jumbos | 4-5-6 | ||
| 39 | Bears 2 | 1-3-4 | def. | Huskies | 2-5-6 | ||
| 40 | Bulls | 1-2-6 | def. | Quakers | 3-4-5 | ||
| 41 | Bears 1 | 1-3-4 | def. | Engineers | 2-5-6 | ||
| 42 | Big Green | 1-2-5 | def. | Big Red | 3-4-6 | ||
| 43 | Terriers | 2-3-4 | def. | Crimson | 1-5-6 | ||
| 44 | Polar Bears | 1-2-4 | def. | Huskies | 3-5-6 | ||
| 45 | Bears 2 | 1-2-4 | def. | Jumbos | 3-5-6 | ||
| 46 | Rams | 2-3-4 | def. | Bulls | 1-5-6 | ||
| 47 | Bears 1 | 1-2-6 | def. | Quakers | 3-4-5 | ||
| 48 | Big Green | 1-2-6 | def. | Engineers | 3-4-5 | ||
| 49 | Terriers | 2-3-4 | def. | Huskies | 1-5-6 | ||
| 50 | Bears 2 | 1-2-5 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 51 | Big Red | 1-2-5 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-6 | ||
| 52 | Crimson | 1-4-5 | def. | Rams | 2-3-6 | ||
| 53 | Bears 1 | 1-2-3 | def. | Big Green | 4-5-6 | ||
| 54 | Huskies | 1-2-5 | def. | Bulls | 3-4-6 | ||
| 55 | Engineers | 1-2-5 | def. | Bears 2 | 3-4-6 | ||
| 56 | Polar Bears | 1-3-4 | def. | Quakers | 2-5-6 | ||
| 57 | Terriers | 1-2-4 | def. | Jumbos | 3-5-6 | ||
| 58 | Big Red | 1-2-5 | def. | Rams | 3-4-6 | ||
| 59 | Bears 1 | 1-2-3 | def. | Crimson | 4-5-6 | ||
| 60 | Bears 2 | 1-2-6 | def. | Bulls | 3-4-5 | ||
| 61 | Engineers | 1-2-3 | def. | Polar Bears | 4-5-6 | ||
| 62 | Big Green | 2-3-4 | def. | Quakers | 1-5-6 | ||
| 63 | Terriers | 1-2-3 | def. | Rams | 4-5-6 | ||
| 64 | Crimson | 2-3-4 | def. | Huskies | 1-5-6 | ||
| 65 | Bulls | 1-3-4 | def. | Jumbos | 2-5-6 | ||
| 66 | Polar Bears | 2-3-5 | def. | Big Red | 1-4-6 | ||
| 67 | Bears 2 | 2-3-5 | def. | Quakers | 1-4-6 | ||
| 68 | Rams | 2-3-4 | def. | Engineers | 1-5-6 | ||
| 69 | Big Green | 1-2-3 | def. | Crimson | 4-5-6 | ||
| 70 | Bears 1 | 1-2-5 | def. | Huskies | 3-4-6 | ||
| 71 | Terriers | 1-2-5 | def. | Bulls | 3-4-6 | ||
| 72 | Bears 2 | 2-3-4 | def. | Big Red | 1-5-6 | ||
| 73 | Engineers | 1-2-5 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-6 | ||
| 74 | Quakers | 1-3-4 | def. | Crimson | 2-5-6 | ||
| 75 | Bears 1 | 1-2-6 | def. | Rams | 3-4-5 | ||
| 76 | Terriers | 2-3-4 | def. | Polar Bears | 1-5-6 | ||
| 77 | Huskies | 1-2-6 | def. | Big Red | 3-4-5 | ||
| 78 | Big Green | 2-3-4 | def. | Jumbos | 1-5-6 | ||
| 79 | Big Green | 1-2-5 | def. | Bears 2 | 3-4-6 | ||
| 80 | Big Red | 1-2-5 | def. | Terriers | 3-4-6 | ||
| 81 | Engineers | 1-2-5 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 82 | Bears 1 | 1-2-5 | def. | Rams | 3-4-6 | ||
| 83 | Terriers | 1-2-3 | def. | Bears 2 | 4-5-6 | ||
| 84 | Big Green | 1-2-6 | def. | Engineers | 3-4-5 | ||
| 85 | Big Red | 1-2-3 | def. | Rams | 4-5-6 | ||
| 86 | Bears 1 | 1-2-3 | def. | Polar Bears | 4-5-6 | ||
| 87 | Terriers | 1-2-5 | def. | Engineers | 3-4-6 | ||
| 88 | Bears 2 | 1-2-5 | def. | Rams | 3-4-6 | ||
| 89 | Big Green | 1-2-3 | def. | Polar Bears | 4-5-6 | ||
| 90 | Bears 1 | 2-3-4 | def. | Big Red | 1-5-6 | ||
| 91 | Engineers | 1-2-4 | def. | Rams | 3-5-6 | ||
| 92 | Terriers | 1-2-4 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-5-6 | ||
| 93 | Big Red | 1-2-6 | def. | Bears 2 | 3-4-5 | ||
| 94 | Bears 1 | 1-2-3 | def. | Big Green | 4-5-6 | ||
| 95 | Rams | 1-2-6 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-4-5 | ||
| 96 | Engineers | 1-4-5 | def. | Big Red | 2-3-6 | ||
| 97 | Big Green | 1-3-4 | def. | Terriers | 2-5-6 | ||
| 98 | Bears 1 | 1-2-6 | def. | Bears 2 | 3-4-5 | ||
| 99 | Big Red | 1-2-5 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 100 | Big Green | 1-2-3 | def. | Rams | 4-5-6 | ||
| 101 | Bears 2 | 2-3-4 | def. | Engineers | 1-5-6 | ||
| 102 | Bears 1 | 1-2-5 | def. | Terriers | 3-4-6 | ||
| 103 | Big Green | 1-2-6 | def. | Big Red | 3-4-5 | ||
| 104 | Bears 2 | 1-2-5 | def. | Polar Bears | 3-4-6 | ||
| 105 | Rams | 1-4-5 | def. | Terriers | 2-3-6 | ||
| 106 | Engineers | 1-2-3 | def. | Bears 1 | 4-5-6 | ||
| 107 | Quakers | 1-2-6 | def. | Crimson | 3-4-5 | ||
| 108 | Bulls | 1-2-6 | def. | Huskies | 3-4-5 | ||
| 109 | Quakers | 1-2-4 | def. | Jumbos | 3-5-6 | ||
| 110 | Bulls | 1-2-6 | def. | Crimson | 3-4-5 | ||
| 111 | Huskies | 1-3-4 | def. | Jumbos | 2-5-6 | ||
| 112 | Quakers | 1-2-5 | def. | Bulls | 3-4-6 | ||
| 113 | Crimson | 2-3-4 | def. | Huskies | 1-5-6 | ||
| 114 | Bulls | 1-2-6 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-5 | ||
| 115 | Quakers | 1-2-4 | def. | Huskies | 3-5-6 | ||
| 116 | Crimson | 1-2-3 | def. | Jumbos | 4-5-6 | ||
| 117 | Quakers | 1-2-3 | def. | Crimson | 4-5-6 | ||
| 118 | Bulls | 1-3-4 | def. | Huskies | 2-5-6 | ||
| 119 | Quakers | 1-2-5 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-6 | ||
| 120 | Crimson | 1-3-5 | def. | Bulls | 2-4-6 | ||
| 121 | Jumbos | 2-3-5 | def. | Huskies | 1-4-6 | ||
| 122 | Bulls | 1-2-3 | def. | Quakers | 4-5-6 | ||
| 123 | Crimson | 1-2-5 | def. | Huskies | 3-4-6 | ||
| 124 | Bulls | 1-2-6 | def. | Jumbos | 3-4-5 | ||
| 125 | Quakers | 2-3-4 | def. | Huskies | 1-5-6 | ||
| 126 | Jumbos | 2-3-5 | def. | Crimson | 1-4-6 | ||
Orderliness is how tightly a fleet race’s finishing order follows the pre-regatta ratings, relative to a typical event (0): positive is the favourites’ day, negative the underdogs’. A value of ±0.06 means a rating gap counts about 6% more than on a typical day. This event is not a fleet race the rating model scores, so there is no actual value for it: this is what this venue’s fleet racing history says about the breeze on the day, read off the chart at the star. How this is estimated · compare venues.
Short write-ups of what the ratings and results show, with the numbers and how they were computed.